Our approach to responsible AI
AI4Schools is designed as an educational support platform for teachers, students and schools. The platform uses AI to assist learning activities, creative work, formative feedback, classroom preparation and school workflows. It is not intended to replace teachers, make final educational decisions, rank students, determine access to education, or produce legally binding outcomes.
EU AI Act position
We maintain an internal EU AI Act compliance file for AI4Schools, including intended-purpose statements, risk classification records, transparency information, human-oversight measures, prompt and model-governance records, post-market monitoring procedures, and incident-response routes.
Our current product design is based on a human-in-the-loop educational support model. AI-generated outputs are presented as suggestions or formative learning indicators for review by teachers and authorised school staff. Schools remain responsible for their own deployment context, policies, lawful basis, and human decisions.
Transparency for users
- AI-assisted features are labelled in the relevant applications.
- AI outputs should be reviewed by a teacher or authorised adult before being relied on in an educational setting.
- The platform does not present AI-generated feedback as a final grade, assessment decision, student ranking, admission decision, or disciplinary decision.
- Users should not enter unnecessary sensitive personal data into free-text prompts.
Human oversight and school control
AI4Schools is built so that teachers and schools keep control of educational use. AI outputs are meant to support preparation, discussion, creativity, practice and feedback. Any final judgement about a learner, class, assignment, progression, intervention or official school record must be made by authorised human staff under the school’s own procedures.
Data protection and security
We apply role-based access controls, security controls, data-minimisation practices, and operational safeguards appropriate for school environments. For deployments involving live school data, the relevant school or organisation should complete its own data-protection review, including DPIA or FRIA steps where required, and confirm any provider, processor, residency and retention requirements before production use.
Continuous review
AI regulation and guidance continue to evolve. We review AI4Schools’ intended uses, user-facing notices, risk controls, documentation and monitoring processes as the EU AI Act implementation timeline and official guidance develop.
Last updated: 13 June 2026.